Analysis of Mlks Three Ways of Meeting Oppression

Oppression and injustice have been prevalent issues in society since the formation of this country. During the 1960’s, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a influential advocate for equal rights, especially in the South. He discussed possible solutions to such social issues in his speeches and essays. One essay, â€Å"Three ways of meeting oppression,† introduces acceptable solutions that can be seen as rational and ethical, as well as emotionally appealing. The significance of such solutions can not be refuted, although the techniques may have opposition. Overall, King contributed vital information benefiting the struggle against injustice within his essay. King discusses his point of view regarding various techniques that can be utilized to†¦show more content†¦It can be said that taking a stand against oppression was not worth the risk. One who is oppressed may believe that his life, or the life of his family, is not worth jeopardizing for the results of an unknown outcome. It may be seen as undeserving to fight for a battle that will necessitate many sacrifices until minute changes will be apparent. Opponents to King’s ideas may even say that although the long term results may be valuable, the immediate repercussions are so detrimental that they are not worth the sacrifice. King’s ideas regarding civil rights and injustice are valued by most people, and this essay demonstrates how articulate and meaningful his words truly are. Although opposite views can be noted, based on the logistical aspects of struggle, the rational, ethical, and emotional views that King expressed can not accurately be refuted. This essay precisely expresses the importance of fighting for justice, and the correct manner in which to do